| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
| When defining a picture being worth a 1,000 words, no where does this ring truer than in a Seattle dui case? If the officer has a video tape of your car swerving all over the road or the field sobriety tests are of definite failure. A video tape is very difficult to overcome if it is bad. |
|
| The reverse it true if a video camera is present in the car and no video tape is entered into evidence by the prosecution. A good Seattle dui attorney will not let the prosecution slip on this because we live in a world of high tech police cars. Why wasn't another car called to the scene so that the jury would be able to see the field sobriety tests? This should be the theme of the trial. Why do we have to take the officers words for the failure, why can't we see the tests with our own eyes. |
|
| If the video tape evidence clearly illustrates that the person was impaired while driving, winning a dui case or getting the charges reduced will be extremely difficult. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|